(or am i thinking of a different "call")
I also got an idea for a new character for the comic's.
"Life isn't like one of your novels, Dear." Her friends would scoff. "You go up to one of those monsters and you'll be eaten alive!" Or at least, that's what they would have said if squirrels could talk. However, Mrs. Nibbly knew one day she was destined to be more than an ordinary housewife. Her dreams at night were filled with images of adventure and romance among the giants. Now, after having lost her husband the winter prior, she decides it's finally time to live her dreams.
Though terrified, she stood her ground as the two-legged beast approached, never allowing it to see her fear. And it was just as she had always imagined! He accepted her! Climbing atop the creature, Mrs. Nibbly knew her life was about to change. What sights would she see? She didn't know or care. All she knew was that she would be sharing it with him - her new, life-long friend and companion. And perhaps one day... more?
This section penned by Raine.
Who knows? The story has still a long way to go, let's see how this progress further into the story. x3
Option 2: Snuggles
Option 3: *CENSORED*
Option 4: Freak out like a total pansy
Great work :3
I don't know, just give her a pair of pants. Enough posterior has made its way onto this site, and I don't see why she needs to be naked.
You: "Put some clothes on her...please. I mean, you're the artist, but I think this would look better if she had at least something to cover her approximate genitals."
My reply: "I see no balls on her anywhere ._. plus shes a girl so she has none to begin with question mark?" (at the time of this statement I was thinking you meant genitalia as in "balls" so no where in this post did it have anything to do with "prohibiting criticism" it was a post stating that I did not see in the image what you were implying plain and simple)
You: "Criticism is allowed, you know. I'm not trying to be mean. And yes, she is a girl, so she would still have genitals." (the thought in my mind when I first read this comment was "WTF are you talking about")
My Reply: "I do not recall stating that criticism was not allowed ._. and none taken. Also, when I was referring to the type of genitals, I was referring to the type that are easily visible, which are nowhere "hanging out" in the picture. So I see no need for the covers to cover up what isn't showing ._." (still was thinking wtf)
Your most recent reply: "I do not recall asking for someone to indirectly prohibit criticism. Your message is still being sent even if your direct statement was not worded the most clearly to convey it.
I don't know, just give her a pair of pants. Enough posterior has made its way onto this site, and I don't see why she needs to be naked."
My overall thoughts, go see a shrink you lack the common sense to reply to something in a simple manner and only manage to make things more complicated k thx bai.